ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025
Enhancing synchrotron radiation micro-CT images using deep learning: an application of Noise2Inverse on bone imaging.
Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In bone-imaging research, in situ synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography (SRµCT) mechanical tests are used to investigate the mechanical properties of bone in relation to its microstructure. Low-dose computed tomography (CT) is used to preserve bone's mechanical properties from radiation damage, though it increases noise. To reduce this noise, the self-supervised deep learning method Noise2Inverse was used on low-dose SRµCT images where segmentation using traditional thresholding techniques was not possible. Simulated-dose datasets were created by sampling projection data at full, one-half, one-third, one-fourth and one-sixth frequencies of an in situ SRµCT mechanical test. After convolutional neural networks were trained, Noise2Inverse performance on all dose simulations was assessed visually and by analyzing bone microstructural features. Visually, high image quality was recovered for each simulated dose. Lacunae volume, lacunae aspect ratio and mineralization distributions shifted slightly in full, one-half and one-third dose network results, but were distorted in one-fourth and one-sixth dose network results. Following this, new models were trained using a larger dataset to determine differences between full dose and one-third dose simulations. Significant changes were found for all parameters of bone microstructure, indicating that a separate validation scan may be necessary to apply this technique for microstructure quantification. Noise present during data acquisition from the testing setup was determined to be the primary source of concern for Noise2Inverse viability. While these limitations exist, incorporating dose calculations and optimal imaging parameters enables self-supervised deep learning methods such as Noise2Inverse to be integrated into existing experiments to decrease radiation dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.