ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders
Challenges in skill acquisition and memory retention in children with developmental language disorder.
Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenges in skill acquisition and memory retention in children with developmental language disorder.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding memory retention in children with developmental language disorder (DLD) compared with their typically developing (TD) peers enhances our knowledge of memory processes.
aimsTo examine long-term memory consolidation of a declarative object-location task and a procedural symbol-writing task, along with grammatical and lexical skills, in 5-year-old children with DLD and their age-matched peers. METHODS & PROCEDURES: A total of 23 children with DLD and 30 TD peers participated. For procedural memory, children practiced writing a new symbol and were assessed 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice. For declarative memory, they practiced locating cards until they achieved 75% correct responses and were assessed again 4 hours and 2 weeks post-practice. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: Children with DLD had fewer correct responses on the declarative-memory object location task with the gap widening significantly from 4 hours to 2 weeks post-training. On the procedural symbol-writing task, children with DLD showed overall lower accuracy. Furthermore, only their TD peers exhibited delayed gains 4 hours post-training in production times, while they narrowed the gap two weeks later. A speed-accuracy trade-off was observed during their symbol-writing practice. These results highlight atypical long-term declarative memory retention and procedural knowledge acquisition in DLD. Consistent with previous studies, declarative memory correlated with lexical scores in both groups, while procedural memory correlated with grammatical scores only in TD peers. Interestingly, long-term procedural learning was linked to lexical abilities in children with TD. Characterizing child performance in short and long intervals following practice may aid clinicians in supporting children with DLD beyond the clinical setting. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Current studies emphasize the role of long-term memory in language learning, particularly procedural memory for grammar and declarative memory for lexical knowledge but often overlook longer term performance and non-sleep memory consolidation. Additionally, most research focuses on older children, with few studies addressing younger children at critical language acquisition ages, a gap this study aims to fill. What this paper adds to the existing knowledge The study shows that children with DLD exhibit atypical patterns in declarative and procedural memory post-training. It also establishes correlations between memory types and language skills, highlighting distinct memory challenges in children with DLD compared with their TD peers. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The clinical implications of this study highlight the need for targeted interventions to address post-practice memory deficits in children with DLD. The findings indicate that children with DLD struggle with both declarative and procedural memory tasks at different post-training intervals, suggesting the necessity for early, ongoing support. Personalized educational and clinical strategies that consider each child's unique memory profile can enhance language acquisition and overall learning outcomes, making tailored interventions crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.