Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167349›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dermatology2025

Comprehensive Literature Review Evaluating the Use, Safety, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Methotrexate in the Treatment of Adult Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis.

Manuelle Viguier, José-Manuel Carrascosa-Carrillo, Pariyawan Rakvit, Maria-Magdalena Constantin, Alice-Anaïs Varlet, Solenn Le Clanche, Linda A W Verhagen, Wolf-Henning Boehncke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Manuelle ViguierDepartment of Dermatology, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France.
José-Manuel Carrascosa-CarrilloDermatology Department, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, IGTP, UAB, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-0771
Pariyawan RakvitDermatology Department, East Lancashire Hospitals Trust, Blackburn, UK.
Maria-Magdalena Constantin"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Alice-Anaïs VarletMedical Affairs Department, Public Health Expertise, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-4884
Solenn Le ClancheMedical Affairs Department, Public Health Expertise, Paris, France.
Linda A W VerhagenMedical Affairs Department, Nordic Pharma, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands.
Wolf-Henning BoehnckeDivision of Dermatology and Venereology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Nordic Pharma Group
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methotrexate (MTX) is a conventional systemic therapy widely used to treat chronic plaque-type psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. MTX can be administered orally or subcutaneously. Over the past decades, the use of subcutaneous versus oral MTX has been a subject of ongoing debate among dermatologists. Therefore, this literature review aimed to investigate the differences between oral and subcutaneous MTX described in the scientific literature in terms of intestinal absorption and bioavailability, efficacy, safety, patient satisfaction and quality of life, treatment adherence, and economic outlook. Thirty-two articles were included in the review, notably including evidence-based guidelines on the management of psoriasis, as well as randomized clinical trials and real-world studies. Only European guidelines recommend the use of subcutaneous MTX over oral MTX; hence, the use of subcutaneous MTX is reported almost exclusively in European countries. Despite the paucity and heterogeneity of the literature, findings from the review suggest that subcutaneous MTX may overcome some limitations of the oral route in terms of intestinal absorption, bioavailability, and safety. Moreover, subcutaneous MTX may provide higher efficacy with a faster, or even greater, response in psoriatic patients and better adherence to treatment. In conclusion, subcutaneous MTX tends to be advantageous with regard to psoriasis management, similar to other chronic inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis; however, this comes with a higher cost. The treatment of psoriasis using subcutaneous MTX deserves further study, especially in the biologics age.

Indexed as

Dermatologic AgentsMethotrexatePsoriasisAdministration, OralAdultBiological AvailabilityHumansInjections, SubcutaneousIntestinal AbsorptionMedication AdherencePatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeDermatologic AgentsMethotrexatechronic plaque‐type psoriasisefficacymethotrexateoral usesafetysubcutaneous use

Identifiers

PMID40167349
PMCPMC12332243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.