Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167121›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Myopia control using a modified optical defocus soft contact lens in schoolchildren-A 12-month randomised double masked control trial.

Hanyu Zhang, Ka Yan Leung, Myra Leung, Wing Chun Tang, Chun Ki Wong, Ka King Liu, Dennis Yan Yin Tse, Paul H Lee, Carly Siu Yin Lam

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Myopia control using a modified optical defocus soft contact lens in schoolchildren-A 12-month randomised double masked control trial.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  3. Eight-Year Post-Trial Outcomes of a Two-Year Clinical Trial of DIMS Spectacle Lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hanyu ZhangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4932-1887
Ka Yan LeungCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Myra LeungDiscipline of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.
Wing Chun TangCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chun Ki WongCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Ka King LiuCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Dennis Yan Yin TseCentre for Eye and Vision Research, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-9121
Paul H LeeSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Carly Siu Yin LamCentre for Eye and Vision Research, Hong Kong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6808-5018

Funding

InnoHK initiative and the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region GovernmentJohnson & Johnson Vision Care ZG6XResearch Grant Council (RGC)RGC Research Impact Fund R5032-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDefocus Incorporated Soft Contact (DISC) lenses with +2.50 D myopic defocus reduced myopia progression by 25% in a previous randomised clinical trial (RCT). The current study aimed to evaluate if a stronger myopic defocus, +3.50 D with variable myopic defocus (DISC3.5plus), could slow myopia progression compared with single vision (SV) soft contact lenses in a 12-month RCT.

methodsConducted from December 2018 to January 2021, the current RCT randomly assigned myopic children to wear DISC3.5plus (n = 87) or SV (n = 80) lenses. Myopia progression and axial elongation were compared between the two groups. Analyses were performed for both enrolled and completed participants.

resultsFor all enrolled participants, the DISC3.5plus group had significantly less myopia progression (mean difference: -0.15 ± 0.07 D, p = 0.02) and axial elongation (mean difference: 0.04 ± 0.02 D, p = 0.04) than the SV group at 6 months but not at 12 months (myopia progression: p = 0.11; axial elongation: p = 0.13). For completed participants, the DISC3.5plus group (n = 33) had reduced myopia progression at both 6 months (0.25 ± 0.07 D, p = 0.001) and 12 months (0.19 ± 0.09 D, p = 0.049) compared with the SV group (n = 40), but not in axial elongation (6 months: p = 0.16; 12 months: p = 0.32). In January 2020, the coronavirus pandemic disturbed contact lens-wearing patterns.

conclusionDISC3.5plus lenses significantly slowed myopia progression and axial elongation compared with SV lenses for all enrolled participants over 6 months. The pandemic hindered longer term efficacy follow-up and sample size; thus, further investigation with more participants is needed to confirm sustained treatment effects.

Indexed as

Contact Lenses, HydrophilicMyopiaRefraction, OcularAdolescentChildDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeVisual Acuitycontact lensmyopia controlmyopic defocusrandomised clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID40167121
PMCPMC12087850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.