Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167049›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in infectious diseases2025

A role for genomics-based studies of Bordetella pertussis adaptation.

Sarah K Cameron, Andrew Preston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah K CameronThe Milner Centre for Evolution and Department of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Andrew Preston

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCases of whooping cough (pertussis) have rebounded strongly from the very low incidence observed during the pandemic. This re-emergence is characterized by changes in epidemiology. Here we describe the importance of genomics to monitor and understand the drivers to these changes. RECENT

findingsChanges in the genotype of strains isolated during recent outbreaks suggests that the pandemic disturbed the global Bordetella pertussis population structure. The emergence of dominant and antibiotic-resistant clones in China is of concern even though the source of antibiotic selection pressure on B. pertussis is unclear. A recent study illustrates how to use genomic data to go beyond just surveillance, inferring the relative fitness of genotypes and the identification of specific mutations distinguishing such lineages. Such approaches are required to understand the forces driving adaptation. SUMMARY: Pertussis is resurgent in many countries, involving changes in epidemiology and strong suggestions of strain adaptation. The continued use of vaccination, and design of new interventions, to control pertussis requires an understanding of these changes. Genomic analyses will be key to this, involving integration of more complete host and pathogen parameters than have been used to date.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBordetella pertussisGenomicsWhooping CoughDisease OutbreaksGenome, BacterialGenotypeHumansadaptationantibiotic resistancegenomicsphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID40167049
PMCPMC12052047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.