ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
A City "Collabatory": Researchers, Commissioners and Community Members Planning Interventions Together.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improving children's health and development in their early years is important, urgent and, cost-effective. But it's difficult to do. Using an example from Bradford in the UK we argue that integration, innovation and community engagement are key. Long-term funding also helps. Problems with multiple causes need "whole system" responses. This includes integration of research, commissioning and service delivery. We test innovations, learn about how they are received, modify them and test again. A dynamic research programme starts with innovations that are "science-based"-things the literature suggests might work-and then evaluates them. Science-based approaches may translate into being "evidence-based". If a community is not ready for an intervention what needs to be put in place to enhance that readiness? We use two examples of using the Community Readiness Model. For obesity interventions in Roma children the model underlines the need to build trust. For interventions targeting social and emotional health, service planners need to explain what they are seeking to do and why it might be valuable. If the community is on-board, the professionals work together and there is security in broad-based long-term funding our "collabatory" approach just might change bringing up children in this city.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.