ReviewCurrent opinion in psychiatry2025
Substantiating policy recommendations for reducing gambling-related harms with perspectives from individuals with lived experience.
Review in Current opinion in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewChanges in gambling regulation have been linked to public health concerns, with system- and population-level approaches suggested to prevent and reduce gambling-related harms in societies. This review utilizes recent qualitative studies on individuals with lived experience of gambling-related harms to substantiate and inform refinement of current policy-level recommendations. RECENT
findingsRecent policy recommendations are well poised to address issues faced by individuals with lived experience of gambling-related harms, as reflected in several recent qualitative studies. Pertinent topics include increased accessibility to gambling via digitization, limitations of self-exclusion, and difficulty adhering to self-imposed financial limits. A range of barriers, including stigma, aggressive advertising by gambling operators, and gambling opportunities in video games, may undermine the effectiveness of some policies (e.g., self-exclusion, deposit limits, and age restrictions, respectively). SUMMARY: The perspectives of individuals with lived experience of gambling-related harms can be invaluable in complementing, strengthening, and contextualizing quantitative results to substantiate policy recommendations and provide insight into potential limitations of the recommendations to refine population-level strategies. Individuals with lived experience should be involved in future research involving monitoring of the gambling industry and assessing the impact of regulatory measures to strengthen the process of evaluating and adapting policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.