Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166886›Full record

Observational studyColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025

A multicentre prospective single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the treatment outcomes of prophylactic laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.

Atsushi Hamabe, Junichi Nishimura, Yozo Suzuki, Masayoshi Yasui, Masakazu Ikenaga, Tsukasa Tanida, Shinichi Yoshioka, Yoshihito Ide, Yusuke Takahashi, Hiroshi Takeyama and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Atsushi HamabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Junichi NishimuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yozo SuzukiDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masayoshi YasuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6391-3630
Masakazu IkenagaDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Tsukasa TanidaDepartment of Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
Shinichi YoshiokaDepartment of Surgery, Yao Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshihito IdeDepartment of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke TakahashiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroshi TakeyamaDepartment of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-8349
Takayuki OginoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Hidekazu TakahashiDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0779-407X
Norikatsu MiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Makoto FujiiDivision of Health and Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yuko OhnoDivision of Health and Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hirofumi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Kohei MurataDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Mamoru UemuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThere has been no prospective multicentre validation of the treatment outcomes of minimally invasive lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer; hence, this prospective study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of prophylactic laparoscopic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

methodBetween May 2018 and August 2021, 90 patients with Stage II-III rectal cancer were registered. The clearance range for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection included the lymph nodes around the internal iliac artery and the obturator lymph nodes, while the autonomic nerves were generally preserved. The primary outcome was the incidence of Grade III-IV postoperative complications at discharge. The secondary outcomes were surgical and pathological outcomes, urinary function, sexual function, disease-free survival and overall survival. The experience of each facility and surgeon requirements were set to maintain quality control of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection.

resultsOf the 90 patients, 87 were analysed after exclusion of ineligible patients. There were 30 and 57 cases, respectively, of Stage II and III rectal cancer, among which 17 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median operating time and blood loss were 472 min and 55 mL, respectively. Postoperative complications were observed in 22 patients (25.3%), and the primary outcome of Grade III postoperative complication was observed in five patients (5.7%). Eight lateral lymph nodes were harvested bilaterally, and lateral lymph node metastasis was observed in 14 patients.

conclusionProphylactic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection can be safely performed with adequately quality-controlled laparoscopic procedures.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLymph Node ExcisionProphylactic Surgical ProceduresRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOperative TimePelvislaparoscopic surgerylateral pelvic lymph node dissectionrectal cancershort‐term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40166886
PMCPMC11959524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.