ArticleCureus2025
Outcomes of Two-Stage Autograft Acetabular Reconstruction for Hip Replacement in Young Patients: A Series of 13 Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Managing complex hip arthritis in young patients poses significant challenges due to the critical need to preserve bone stock for potential future surgical interventions. Two-stage reconstruction can preserve bone, restore limb length, and address acetabular defects to achieve optimal functional outcomes and facilitate future revisions. Structural autografts offer the dual advantages of reduced infection risk and enhanced initial stability. This study evaluates the surgical outcomes of two-stage autograft reconstruction in the management of young patients with acetabular defects. This case series reports our experience using a two-stage structural autograft approach for acetabular defects in total hip replacement. In the first stage, the acetabular defect is reconstructed using a femoral head autograft, followed by a second-stage hip replacement after eight weeks. A total of 13 patients underwent this surgery, with a mean age of 35 years. Patients were followed up for an average of five years. Good press-fit stability was achieved in all cases. Follow-up plain radiographs showed excellent trabecular bridging between the graft and host bone, with no evidence of graft resorption or acetabular cup loosening. All patients demonstrated good functional outcomes, with no complications such as non-union, infection, or aseptic loosening. Only one patient had sciatic nerve palsy which resolved spontaneously. This technique is an excellent option for treating young patients with sizable acetabular defects. It effectively restores bone stock, provides essential biological stability, and facilitates future revision surgery when necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.