ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025
MRI monitoring of USPIO-labeled BMSCs combined with alginate scaffold for cartilage defect repair.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) combined with sodium alginate scaffolds in repairing knee cartilage defects in New Zealand rabbits. Additionally, it assessed the potential of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) for non-invasive monitoring of the dynamic repair process. Methods: Rabbits were randomly divided into four groups: Group A (control), Group B (sodium alginate scaffold), Group C (BMSCs-sodium alginate scaffold), and Group D (USPIO-labeled BMSCs-sodium alginate scaffold). A cartilage defect model was created, and the respective materials were implanted into the defect regions. T2 mapping MRI was performed at weeks 1, 2, and 4 post-surgery to evaluate the repair process, followed by histological analysis to confirm the outcomes. Results: BMSCs significantly promoted cartilage defect repair and accelerated the degradation of sodium alginate scaffolds. Macroscopic and histological evaluations revealed repair tissue formation in Groups C and D by week 1, with most defect regions filled with new cartilage by week 4. T2 mapping analysis showed a gradual decline in T2 values in Group B, a more pronounced decrease in Group C, and consistently lower T2 values in Group D compared to Group C, with a slow upward trend over time. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that BMSCs exhibit significant regenerative potential for cartilage defect repair. USPIO labeling enables non-invasive, dynamic monitoring of the repair process without adverse effects on cell viability or differentiation. These findings provide experimental evidence supporting the application of BMSCs combined with magnetic labeling technology in cartilage regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.