Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Exploring the phenotypic diversity of

Mitiku Asfaw Mengistu, Won Cheol Yim, Juan K Q Solomon, John C Cushman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mitiku Asfaw MengistuMS330/Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Won Cheol YimMS330/Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.
Juan K Q SolomonMS202/Department of Agriculture, Veterinary & Rangeland Sciences, Reno, NV, United States.
John C CushmanMS330/Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tef or Teff [ Methods: Two morphological ( Results: Five major panicle forms were identified including very loose, loose, semi-loose, compact, and, very compact, which were present in 24%, 25%, 25%, 18%, and 8% of accessions, respectively. Accessions with very compact panicles showed the highest biomass production and plant height, whereas accessions with loose and very loose panicle forms showed the highest tiller counts, seed yield, and harvest indices. White-seeded accessions were more numerous (55%) than brown-seeded accessions (45%) with white seeds being more common in very compact, compact, and semi-loose panicle forms and brown seeds being more common in loose and very loose panicle forms. Correlation analysis revealed positive associations among fresh weight, dry weight, straw yield, and plant height was well as seed yield and harvest index. Hundred-seed weight was positively correlated with seed area, plant height, and panicle length. Principal component analysis identified fresh weight, dry weight, and straw yield as major contributors (72.6%) to total trait variation. Hierarchical agglomerative clustering analysis revealed five distinct groups based upon the quantitative agronomic traits. Discussion: These data provide an invaluable resource for genome-wide association studies, stratified sampling, and parental line selection for ongoing

Indexed as

agronomic traitsbiofuel feedstockbiomassEragrostis tefgrainphenotypingTef

Identifiers

PMID40166726
PMCPMC11955633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.