ArticleCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2025
Evaluating the effects of remineralizing agents on initial carious lesions.
Article in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Initial carious lesions are reversible, and fluoride-containing reagents effectively promote enamel remineralization in these initial lesions. Numerous remineralizing agents are available, some containing fluoride and others containing alternatives because of fluoride toxicity concerns. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the following remineralizing agents: fluoride varnish (5% NaF, Duraphat Materials and Methods: Forty human maxillary premolar teeth were randomized into 4 experimental groups: distilled water, fluoride varnish, CPP-ACP, and CPP-ACPF. All 40 teeth were cut in half mesiodistally. A Vickers microhardness test was performed on the buccal half of each tooth; the lingual half was examined with a spectrophotometer for colour dimension. An Atomic Force Microscope was used to evaluate roughness. During the experiments, microhardness, colour, and roughness were examined 3 times: 1) before treatment; 2) after demineralization; and 3) after remineralization. At each stage, a scanning electron microscope was used to examine surface features and enable energy dispersive X-ray chemical composition analysis. Results: Demineralization carried out in preparation for testing of the agents caused enamel hardness to decrease significantly. Enamel roughness increased, although not significantly. After remineralization, each of the 3 remineralizing agents had significantly increased both hardness and lightness (L*), compared to the demineralized enamel. Each agent decreased enamel roughness, but the roughness change was not significant. Conclusion: Comparing the 3 remineralizing agents, there were no significant differences between the agents in effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40166723PMC11956675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.