ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2025
Effects of visual guidance and instrument choice on symptom recurrence following adenoidectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the impact of visual guidance and instrument choice on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and otitis media with effusion (OME) symptom recurrence and reoperation rates following adenoidectomy in pediatric patients. Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Setting: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus, with the final search on September 23, 2024. Reference lists were also screened. Participants: Eligible studies included RCTs published from 2000 onwards, with ≥25 pediatric patients undergoing adenoidectomy for OSA or OME. Comparisons included visually guided versus blinded and cold versus hot adenoidectomy techniques. Studies involving concurrent procedures, craniofacial abnormalities, or non-primary adenoidectomy cases were excluded. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were OSA and OME symptom recurrence and reoperation rates following adenoidectomy. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and evidence quality was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Of 2302 screened articles, 35 underwent full-text review, and 4r studies (373 participants) met inclusion criteria. All studies compared hot and cold techniques, with hot techniques being visually guided. Only one study directly compared both hot and cold techniques under visual guidance, reporting lower OSA recurrence rates with the hot technique, though with a high risk of bias. Other studies found no significant differences, and none reported reoperation rates. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis. Overall risk of bias and evidence quality were moderate. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to determine whether visual guidance reduces symptom recurrence following adenoidectomy. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to provide more sound conclusions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42024513408.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.