ArticleSSM - population health2025
Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups.
Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Introduction to the special issue collection, How and why are health inequalities changing over time?SSM - population health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, poor health is associated with lower socioeconomic status (i.e., the gradient). While significant socio-demographic drivers of socioeconomic inequalities have been documented in South Africa, little is known about changes in socioeconomic inequalities in health between and within socioeconomic groups, an essential consideration for closing the gaps between socioeconomic groups. This paper assesses changes in health inequalities in South Africa, using self-assessed health (SAH) to uncover the relative contributions of inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups to changes in socioeconomic inequalities in SAH. It uses data from five waves (2008, 2010/11, 2012, 2014/15, and 2017) of South Africa's nationally representative National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) as cross-sectional with a final sample size ranging between 13,732 and 21,303 adults (>18 years). Based on five categories, SAH was recategorised and dichotomised as "good health" with SAH = 1. Socioeconomic status and quintiles were based on per capita household expenditure. The standard concentration index measured socioeconomic inequality in SAH. A recent methodology decomposes changes in the concentration index of SAH into changes in inequality within and between socioeconomic groups. A pro-poor shift or change is when socioeconomic inequality in health (including for between- and within-socioeconomic groups) reduces between two time periods, while an increase in inequalities means a pro-rich shift or change. The results show a significant pro-rich gradient in SAH among adults in South Africa (concentration index ranging between 0.0053 and 0.0327), with good health reported more by relatively wealthier adults than their more socioeconomically deprived counterparts. This pro-rich gradient declined overall between 2008 and 2017 (a pro-poor shift), associated mainly (between 96% and 100%) with reduced inequalities between socioeconomic groups, i.e., closing gaps between socioeconomic groups. Addressing health inequalities in South Africa requires a multisectoral approach prioritising socioeconomically deprived individuals and policy to reduce health disparities between groups that leave no one behind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.