ReviewEClinicalMedicine2025
Adequacy of recommendations for adverse event management in national and international treatment guidelines for rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis: a systematic review.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse events during tuberculosis treatment are common and are a major challenge for patients and front-line care providers. We did a systematic review of treatment guidelines for rifampicin-susceptible tuberculosis to evaluate the adequacy of recommendations for adverse event management. Methods: We searched websites, guideline registries, PubMed, and mobile health Apps to identify treatment guidelines published from October 2004 to October 2024. We recorded the presence and evidence base for specific recommendations for management of nausea/vomiting, hepatotoxicity, skin reactions, neuropathy, visual changes, drug fever, and arthralgias. Findings: We included 47 guidelines: 25 from high-burden countries, 12 international and prominent national guidelines, and 10 non-governmental guidelines. 37 guidelines (79%) included recommendations for managing adverse events: 24 (96%) of guidelines from high-burden countries, eight (80%) of those from non-governmental organizations, and four (33%) of international and prominent national guidelines. Four recommendations had formal ratings of supporting evidence. Interpretation: International and prominent national guidelines frequently lack recommendations for adverse event management or had non-specific recommendations. Research on prevention and management of common and serious adverse events should be a priority for improving the patient's experience and the outcomes of tuberculosis treatment. Funding: This research was supported by Wellcome Trust Clinical Grants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.