Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Bibliometric and visualized analysis of the applications of exosomes for bone regeneration.

Shuai Ai, Zhou Xie, Ningdao Li, Runhan Zhao, Xiao Qu, Haining Zhou, Dagang Tang, Jun Zhang, Xiaoji Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shuai Ai *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Zhou Xie *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ningdao Li *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Runhan ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiao QuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Haining ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dagang TangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Jun ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaoji LuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Municipal Health Commission Key Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Regeneration and Translational Medicine, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bone defect, a common orthopedic condition, is characterized by a lengthy and impactful treatment period, posing a considerable challenge in clinical settings. Medical technology has advanced notably, and has effectively treated an increasing number of patients with bone defects. Consequently, there has been an explosion of research articles on bone regeneration, including a substantial number on the application of exosomes. Exosomes, especially those derived from stem cells, have been confirmed to be effective in bone regeneration and have garnered widespread attention in the last decade. Therefore, this study conducted a bibliometric analysis on publications related to the application of exosomes for bone regeneration. The objectives are to explore the development history and research hotspots in this field over the past 10 years, predict future development trends, and provide guidance for subsequent research. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database was searched for articles related to exosomes and bone regeneration published from 1 January 2014, to 31 December 2023. The collected literature was analyzed using software such as Microsoft Excel, CiteSpace 6.3R1, VOSviewer 1.6.20, and the bibliometric online platform (https://bibliometric.com). Results: A total of 3,004 articles published by 2,729 institutions from 68 countries were included in this study. The number of articles on the application of exosomes for bone regeneration has increased annually over the last decade. China was the most prolific country in this field, with a total of 1,468 papers; Shanghai Jiao Tong University (China) was the institution with the highest number of publications (117 publications). In terms of authors, Xin Wang, Yi Zhang, and Yang Wang were the three who published the highest number of papers, with 14 papers each. Co-citation analysis revealed that the article published by Valadi H in 2007 has the highest number of co-citations (270 times of quotation). Additionally, most research hotspots focused on the function of exosomes and the mechanism of action. Furthermore, the importance of osteoblast differentiation and angiogenesis in bone regeneration has also garnered significant attention from scholars in this field. Conclusion: This study reviewed the research achievements on the application of exosomes for bone regeneration over the past 10 years, utilizing bibliometric analysis tools. It visualized the countries, institutions, authors, and journals that have made significant contributions to this field, revealed current research hotspots, and finally explored future development trends.

Indexed as

bibliometricsbone regenerationexosomesosteogenesisstem cells

Identifiers

PMID40166633
PMCPMC11955700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.