ArticleTransplantation direct2025
Feasibility and Safety of Ex Vivo Delivery of Rituximab to Lung Allografts in Transplant Recipients at High Risk for Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) offers a novel platform for delivering targeted therapies directly to donor lungs before transplantation, potentially reducing systemic side effects. Our study evaluated the feasibility and safety of rituximab delivery to donor lungs from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seropositive donors for transplantation into EBV-seronegative recipients (D Methods: A pilot study was conducted involving 5 EBV-seronegative lung transplant recipients. Donor lungs were perfused with 500 mg rituximab during EVLP for 3-4 h. Primary outcomes included safety and feasibility, assessed by monitoring lung function during perfusion, posttransplant complications, and graft dysfunction. Secondary outcomes included EBV DNAemia, PTLD incidence, peripheral B-cell frequencies, EBV blood transcripts, and rituximab serum levels. Results: Rituximab delivery via EVLP was feasible and safe, with no significant deviations in lung function or adverse events linked to treatment. One patient experienced primary graft dysfunction. Peripheral B-cell counts were reduced immediately posttransplant and remained low in some patients, whereas others rebounded over the weeks posttransplant, and serum rituximab levels were undetectable after 2 wk. Three patients developed EBV DNAemia and 2 developed PTLD within 2 y, although PTLD lesions were not observed in transplanted lungs. Conclusions: EVLP-based rituximab delivery is a feasible and promising strategy for targeting donor-transmitted EBV with minimal systemic exposure. Although the findings suggest potential clinical benefit, the development of PTLD in extrathoracic sites underscores the need for further optimization and larger studies to evaluate efficacy and refine the intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.