ArticleBMJ public health2025
Modifiable social and structural factors influence COVID-19 vaccine intention among frontline workers in the Midwestern USA: a community-engaged survey study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines have been a crucial measure in the pandemic response, yet vaccine uptake has been variable across the population. We sought to identify social and structural factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intention among adults in the Midwestern USA who worked in one or more frontline industries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A community-engaged, cross-sectional online survey study was conducted between May and July 2022 among 889 workers. Guided by Thomas and Penchasky's 5As theory of access and Thomson Results: Workers who intended not to receive the vaccine were at least three times more likely to report transportation challenges, limited time off work and inflexible vaccine appointments compared with those who intended to vaccinate. Interest in financial incentives was strongly endorsed among workers who did not intend to vaccinate and among those who were undecided. Concerns about vaccine safety or side effects did not influence intention, whereas concerns about vaccine effectiveness were more common among workers who did not intend to vaccinate. Mistrust in government leaders was associated with positive vaccine intention. Conclusions: Vaccine intention among frontline workers is strongly influenced by social and structural factors and not solely by hesitancy about the vaccine itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.