ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
The long-term risk of tuberculosis among individuals with Xpert Ultra "trace" screening results: a longitudinal follow-up study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Systematic screening for tuberculosis using Xpert Ultra generates "trace" results of uncertain significance. Additional microbiological testing in this context is often negative, but untreated individuals might still progress to culture-positive disease. We aimed to estimate the two-year risk of tuberculosis among screening participants with trace-positive sputum. Methods: We screened 31,505 people for tuberculosis in Uganda using sputum Xpert Ultra as an initial test, through event-based and door-to-door screening. We enrolled 128 participants with trace-positive sputum (PWTS), 139 Ultra-negative controls into a prospective cohort, and 110 Ultra-positive (>trace) controls for cross-sectional comparison. All participants underwent extensive initial evaluation, and untreated PWTS and negative controls were followed with re-testing for up to 24 months. We estimated cumulative hazards of tuberculosis among PWTS versus negative controls, using two definitions of tuberculosis: one incorporating clinician judgment (primary) and one based strictly on microbiological results (secondary). We then compared hazards between subgroups of PWTS. Findings: Of 128 PWTS, 79 (62%) were male and 19 (15%) HIV-positive. Forty-five (35%) PWTS were recommended for treatment upon enrollment, eight lost to follow-up within three months, and 75 followed for median 706 (interquartile range 344-714) days, of whom 19 were recommended for treatment during follow-up. The cumulative hazard of tuberculosis among PWTS not treated at baseline was 0.24 (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.40) at one year and 0.33 (0.21-0.54) at two years, versus 0.03 (0.01-0.10) at two years for negative controls. Hazards were similar for microbiologically defined tuberculosis (0.36 [0.22-0.58] at 2 years). Tuberculosis diagnosis during follow-up was strongly associated with abnormal baseline chest X-ray (hazard ratio 14.6 [3.3-63.8]) but not with baseline symptoms. Interpretation: Individuals with trace-positive sputum during screening have a substantial two-year risk of tuberculosis, even when extensive initial evaluations do not confirm disease. Treatment should be considered for most screening participants with trace-positive sputum and abnormal chest imaging. Funding: National Institutes of Health and Gates Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.