ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Artificial intelligence automation of echocardiographic measurements.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Accurate measurement of echocardiographic parameters is crucial for the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease and tracking of change over time, however manual assessment is time-consuming and can be imprecise. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to reduce clinician burden by automating the time-intensive task of comprehensive measurement of echocardiographic parameters. Methods: We developed and validated open-sourced deep learning semantic segmentation models for the automated measurement of 18 anatomic and Doppler measurements in echocardiography. The outputs of segmentation models were compared to sonographer measurements from two institutions to access accuracy and precision. Results: We utilized 877,983 echocardiographic measurements from 155,215 studies from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) to develop EchoNet-Measurements, an open-source deep learning model for echocardiographic annotation. The models demonstrated a good correlation when compared with sonographer measurements from held-out data from CSMC and an independent external validation dataset from Stanford Healthcare (SHC). Measurements across all nine B-mode and nine Doppler measurements had high accuracy (an overall R Conclusion: EchoNet-Measurement achieves high accuracy in automated echocardiographic measurement that is comparable to expert sonographers. This open-source model provides the foundation for future developments in AI applied to echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.