Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166527›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Advances in Regenerative Medicine for Orthopedic Injuries: A Comprehensive Review.

Samyabrata Das, Amit Thakur, Anupam Datta, Ayaskant Sahoo, Sukanta Bandyopadhyay, Ashok K Sah

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samyabrata DasOrthopaedic Surgery, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, IND.
Amit ThakurDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, All India Institute of Medical Science Jammu, Jammu, IND.
Anupam DattaForensic Medicine, Agartala Government Medical College & Govind Ballabh Pant (GBP) Hospital, Agartala, IND.
Ayaskant SahooAnaesthesia, NRI Institute of Medical Sciences, Visakhapatnam, IND.
Sukanta BandyopadhyayBiochemistry, Rama Medical College Hospital Research Centre, Kolkata, IND.
Ashok K SahDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied and Health Sciences, A Sharqiyah University, Ibra, OMN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedics is one field that greatly benefits from the new ideas provided by regenerative medicine. This review pulls together the most recent publications involving stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma, growth factor, gene therapy, tissue engineering, stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles, and other regenerative technologies in the context of bone, cartilage, tendon, and ligament healing. Recent studies show that these new therapies can alter cell development, division, and production of fiber and ground substance to remodel tissues. Nevertheless, the clinical application has several issues such as the standardization of cell procurement and preparation, the control of cytokine/gene delivery, the revascularization of tissues, and the requirements of large samples, positively controlled clinical trials. More research must be conducted to overcome such barriers and make practicing more applicable in real life.

Indexed as

3d bioprintinggrowth factorsmesenchymal stem cellsorthopedic applicationsregenerative medicinetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40166527
PMCPMC11956119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.