ArticleCureus2025
Trends and Regional Differences in Usage of Primary External Fixation From 2018 to 2022 in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Open Data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age and Regional Trends in Groin Hernia Surgery in Japan: An Analysis of Laparoscopic Repair, Outpatient Surgery, and Manual Reduction Using National Database Open Data.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Primary external fixation (EF) is a crucial method in orthopedic trauma, particularly for complex fractures with soft tissue damage. Despite its importance in damage control surgery, the patterns of EF use in Japan remain underexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the trends and regional differences in EF usage for fracture treatment in Japan and identify factors associated with its variation across regions. Methods We analyzed data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) covering inpatient surgeries from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was the EF usage ratio, calculated as the number of primary EFs procedures divided by the total number of internal fixations. The trend of the EF usage ratio over five-year period was assessed by Cochrane-Armitage trend test for temporal trends. We also evaluated the associations between EF usage and factors such as population, region, and emergency care availability. Results A total of 610,326 internal fixations and 29,546 EF procedures were identified, with the EF usage ratio increasing from 4,532 out of 119,223 cases (3.8%) in 2018 to 6,861 out of 126,000 cases (5.4%) in 2022 (p < 0.01). Regional EF usage in total of five-year period ranged from 228 out of 8,103 cases (2.8%) in Oita to 814 out of 9,075 cases (9.0%) in Nagasaki, representing a threefold difference. While 12 prefectures showed statistically significant increases in EF usage, no specific factors were found to explain the regional variations in EF utilization. Conclusion EF usage in Japan has risen over the past five years, with notable regional differences. Further research is needed to identify the causes of these variations and promote consistent trauma care across the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.