Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166521›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Trends and Regional Differences in Usage of Primary External Fixation From 2018 to 2022 in Japan: A Retrospective Observational Study Using Open Data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims.

Natsumi Saka, Kentaro Matsui, Yoshinobu Watanabe, Hirotaka Kawano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natsumi SakaOrthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Kentaro MatsuiOrthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Yoshinobu WatanabeOrthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Hirotaka KawanoOrthopaedic Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Primary external fixation (EF) is a crucial method in orthopedic trauma, particularly for complex fractures with soft tissue damage. Despite its importance in damage control surgery, the patterns of EF use in Japan remain underexplored. This study aimed to elucidate the trends and regional differences in EF usage for fracture treatment in Japan and identify factors associated with its variation across regions. Methods We analyzed data from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) covering inpatient surgeries from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was the EF usage ratio, calculated as the number of primary EFs procedures divided by the total number of internal fixations. The trend of the EF usage ratio over five-year period was assessed by Cochrane-Armitage trend test for temporal trends. We also evaluated the associations between EF usage and factors such as population, region, and emergency care availability. Results A total of 610,326 internal fixations and 29,546 EF procedures were identified, with the EF usage ratio increasing from 4,532 out of 119,223 cases (3.8%) in 2018 to 6,861 out of 126,000 cases (5.4%) in 2022 (p < 0.01). Regional EF usage in total of five-year period ranged from 228 out of 8,103 cases (2.8%) in Oita to 814 out of 9,075 cases (9.0%) in Nagasaki, representing a threefold difference. While 12 prefectures showed statistically significant increases in EF usage, no specific factors were found to explain the regional variations in EF utilization. Conclusion EF usage in Japan has risen over the past five years, with notable regional differences. Further research is needed to identify the causes of these variations and promote consistent trauma care across the country.

Indexed as

comminuted fracturesdamage controlinsurance systemmultiple traumaopen fracturesorthopaedic trauma

Identifiers

PMID40166521
PMCPMC11955576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.