Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166519›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Current Use and Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in the Military: A Scoping Review.

Heather Lumley, Nozimakhon Omonullaeva, Philip Dainty, Joseph Paquette, Jack Stensland, Kelsey Reindel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather LumleyOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Nozimakhon OmonullaevaOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Philip DaintyOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.
Joseph PaquetteOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Jack StenslandOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Davie, USA.
Kelsey ReindelOsteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Clearwater, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a hands-on therapy approach used by osteopathic physicians that aims to alleviate viscero-somatic changes by considering the interconnectedness of the body, mind, and spirit. One of the most common uses for OMT is the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints, which are a significant cause of pain and disability across various populations, including the US Military, where personnel often face unique and physically demanding working conditions. In 2019, MSK injuries alone accounted for nearly half of the limited duty days in the US Army, with low back pain being the leading cause of medical encounters over the past 10 years among active-duty personnel. Previous studies have shown that OMT can improve functional status, reduce pain, and have minimal adverse effects when treating low back pain. It has also been found to be twice as effective as placebo treatments and comparable to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in terms of pain relief. Given the high incidence rates of MSK issues during active duty in the military, OMT may be a viable treatment or adjunctive therapy option for this population. The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the current research on OMT among US military members and veterans, determining any potential positive or negative effects that may be attributed to this therapy. A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases from inception to November 2023, yielding 497 articles, which were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nine studies were ultimately included and evaluated based on the target treatment area. The most commonly employed forms of OMT included myofascial release, soft tissue manipulation, and counterstrain techniques. The primary outcomes after OMT were reduced pain and improved range of motion or functionality. Other positive findings included a decrease in opioid usage, reduced nausea, lower healthcare costs, and lower incidence of alcohol and substance use disorders within the military populations studied. This is the first review of its kind to evaluate OMT within military populations, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing pain, increasing functionality, and lowering complications associated with military duties. Further research into the utilization of OMT within the military should be pursued, considering it as a potential first-line or adjunctive therapy for service members and veterans across various settings and dysfunctions to continue evaluating its long-term effectiveness.

Indexed as

militarymusculoskeletalosteopathic manipulative medicineosteopathic manipulative treatmentpain managementveterans

Identifiers

PMID40166519
PMCPMC11955582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.