ReviewCureus2025
Current Use and Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in the Military: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Perceptions of Romanian Medical Students in a Cross-Sectional Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a hands-on therapy approach used by osteopathic physicians that aims to alleviate viscero-somatic changes by considering the interconnectedness of the body, mind, and spirit. One of the most common uses for OMT is the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints, which are a significant cause of pain and disability across various populations, including the US Military, where personnel often face unique and physically demanding working conditions. In 2019, MSK injuries alone accounted for nearly half of the limited duty days in the US Army, with low back pain being the leading cause of medical encounters over the past 10 years among active-duty personnel. Previous studies have shown that OMT can improve functional status, reduce pain, and have minimal adverse effects when treating low back pain. It has also been found to be twice as effective as placebo treatments and comparable to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in terms of pain relief. Given the high incidence rates of MSK issues during active duty in the military, OMT may be a viable treatment or adjunctive therapy option for this population. The purpose of this scoping review is to evaluate the current research on OMT among US military members and veterans, determining any potential positive or negative effects that may be attributed to this therapy. A comprehensive search was conducted across six databases from inception to November 2023, yielding 497 articles, which were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Nine studies were ultimately included and evaluated based on the target treatment area. The most commonly employed forms of OMT included myofascial release, soft tissue manipulation, and counterstrain techniques. The primary outcomes after OMT were reduced pain and improved range of motion or functionality. Other positive findings included a decrease in opioid usage, reduced nausea, lower healthcare costs, and lower incidence of alcohol and substance use disorders within the military populations studied. This is the first review of its kind to evaluate OMT within military populations, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing pain, increasing functionality, and lowering complications associated with military duties. Further research into the utilization of OMT within the military should be pursued, considering it as a potential first-line or adjunctive therapy for service members and veterans across various settings and dysfunctions to continue evaluating its long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.