ArticleCureus2025
Potential Racial Bias During Pediatric Emergency Care: A Simulation Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Despite education to help reduce differences in care, minorities continue to have worse health outcomes. Implicit biases are known to contribute to disparities in healthcare, even in pediatric populations. Prior simulation studies have used computer simulations or standardized patient encounters to understand the potential role of implicit bias in patient interactions. High-fidelity simulation is another method for evaluating patient management decisions in a controlled environment. This study aimed to evaluate whether high-fidelity simulation could reveal differences in pediatric patient management decisions during an emergency based on the skin color of a pediatric manikin. Methods A standard simulation scenario was created for a pediatric sepsis case. Nineteen first-year pediatric residents in their first month of internship were offered the opportunity to participate, and informed consent was obtained for our study approved by CHRISTUS Health. Participants were not made aware that the study involved any evaluation related to manikin skin color. Enrolled participants were randomized to run through the scenario with either a dark or light skin manikin with a standardized patient of the same skin tone playing the role of the parent. After simulations were completed, videos were analyzed by physician graders with a standardized evaluation form documenting interventions and timing. Results The majority of care was not statistically different for both light- and dark-skinned manikins in the sepsis simulation. However, there were some significant differences noted. All of the dark-skinned infants received oxygen while only 55.5% (5/9) of the light-skinned infants received oxygen (p = 0.03). Additionally, 89% (8/9) of the light-skinned infants received compressions after asystole occurred while only 40% (4/10) of the dark-skinned infants received compressions (p = 0.05). Discussion In a simulated pediatric sepsis case, there were significant differences in some interventions on the basis of skin color. While we can only theorize about the reason for these, they may have resulted from assumptions of different etiologies of the emergencies or unconscious reactions to the color of the manikin. Simulation is a unique approach to evaluate this important topic using standardized simulations and evaluation tools, and we intend to use these results to hone further research investigating reasons for the identified differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.