ArticlePsoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Treatment of Psoriasis with II-17 Inhibitors: Comparison of Long-Term Effectiveness and Drug Survival of Secukinumab vs Ixekizumab in Real-World Practice.
Article in Psoriasis (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Successful treatment of inverse psoriasis with ustekinumab: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of the Long-Term Real-World Efficacy of Interleukin-17 Inhibitors in a Cohort of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Treated in Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Successful treatment with secukinumab in a 4-month-old infant with severe generalized pustular psoriasis: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The emergence of IL-17A inhibitors, has led to improvements in psoriasis treatment. However, comparative studies addressing their long-term efficacy and drug survival with associated predictors are scarce. The study aimed to compare the characteristics of patients treated with secukinumab or ixekizumab and in addition to analyze associated factors and independent predictors of drug survival in a real-world setting. Methods: This study was designed as a single-center retrospective study. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess drug survival. Log rank test and Cox regression analysis were performed to identify associated factors and possible independent predictors for drug discontinuation. Results: 81 patients have been included in the study. Ixekizumab showed a trend toward faster and higher Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and 90 response rates compared to secukinumab at weeks 52 (74.6% versus 55.4%) and 104 (41.5% versus 31.1%). Overall, drug survival rates for ixekizumab were always higher than secukinumab, although the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.26). Four predictors were identified. For secukinumab, nail psoriasis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.83; P = 0.02) was assessed to be a protective factor favoring drug continuation, while five or more previous therapies (HR: 5.52, 95% CI: 1.98-15.40, P = 0.007) were considered a risk factor for discontinuation. In the ixekizumab group, psoriasis inversa was identified as a protective factor (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.72; P = 0.02), and female sex (HR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.09-10.99, P = 0.03) was considered a risk factor. Conclusion: Ixekizumab exhibited a non-significant trend toward better long-term efficacy and drug survival compared to secukinumab with slightly lower tolerability. Patient characteristics, including nail psoriasis and treatment history, influenced drug survival differently for each treatment. These findings underscore the importance of personalized treatment strategies in managing psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.