ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Mental simulation and compulsive buying: a multiple mediation model through impulse buying and self-control.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impulse Buying and Cognitive Dissonance: Differences in Self-Justification and Symbolic Consumption Among Adult South Korean Generation Z Sports Consumers.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the multiple mediation effects of impulse buying and a self-control failure on the relationship between two types of mental simulation-outcome and process simulation-and compulsive buying. We collected 202 responses using a web-based survey, which were used as a final example. The respondents for this study were recruited through the web-based survey platform Nown Survey. Using structural equation modeling and PROCESS for SPSS (Model 6), we estimated the internal consistency of measurements and tested the established hypotheses. The main findings confirm the distinct impacts of the two types of mental simulation on primary constructs and the multiple mediation effects of impulse buying and self-control failure on the associations between the two types of mental simulation and compulsive buying. Despite the multiple mediating effects of impulse buying and self-control failure between the two types of mental simulation and compulsive buying, process simulation is positively associated with both impulse buying and compulsive buying, while outcome simulation is significantly related only to impulse buying. Our results supplement existing literature by applying new insights into the relationships between mental simulation and compulsive buying. Further, our findings may help marketers to establish strategies based on the divergent roles of the two types of mental simulation to motivate consumers' purchase behaviors. Finally, the limitations and directions for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.