ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
A corticostriatal learning mechanism linking excess striatal dopamine and auditory hallucinations.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory hallucinations are linked to elevated striatal dopamine, but their underlying computational mechanisms have been obscured by regional heterogeneity in striatal dopamine signaling. To address this, we developed a normative circuit model in which corticostriatal plasticity in the ventral striatum is modulated by reward prediction errors to drive reinforcement learning while that in the sensory-dorsal striatum is modulated by sensory prediction errors derived from internal belief to drive self-supervised learning. We then validate the key predictions of this model using dopamine recordings across striatal regions in mice, as well as human behavior in a hybrid learning task. Finally, we find that changes in learning resulting from optogenetic stimulation of the sensory striatum in mice and individual variability in hallucination proneness in humans are best explained by selectively enhancing dopamine levels in the model sensory striatum. These findings identify plasticity mechanisms underlying biased learning of sensory expectations as a biologically plausible link between excess dopamine and hallucinations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.