Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166130›Full record

ArticleInternational medical case reports journal2025

Exuberant Granulation Complicating an Episiotomy Wound: Case Report on the Treatment Using Surgical Excision and Estrogen Vaginal Cream.

Nnabuike Chibuoke Ngene

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International medical case reports journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nnabuike Chibuoke NgeneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rahima Moosa Hospital, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2278-5836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poor wound healing may limit body functionality and is an indication for clinical intervention. Excessive formation of granulation tissue above the edge of the skin surrounding a wound without re-epithelization is termed exuberant granulation, or proud flesh. It is uncommonly reported as a complication of an episiotomy wound. Aim: This study aimed to report exuberant granulation that complicates an episiotomy wound with a friable vaginal epithelium and to describe the successful treatment of the lesion with surgical excision and topical conjugated equine estrogen vaginal cream. Case Report: A 24-year-old para 1 had spontaneous vaginal birth of a normal baby at term in a district hospital. Five months later, she presented to a regional hospital with complaints of pain and incomplete wound healing at the episiotomy site. She had used topical povidone-iodine ointment with no success. Following a physical examination, an exuberant granulation at the episiotomy wound was diagnosed. The lesions were located mostly at 5 to 7 o'clock position in the vagina which had a thin and friable mucosa. The patient was treated with surgical excision and postoperative topical conjugated equine estrogen vaginal cream 0.625 mg per 1 g at a dose of 0.5 g per intravaginal application twice weekly for two weeks, and thereafter once weekly for one week. A review after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months confirmed complete wound healing and normal function of the genitalia. Conclusion: Exuberant granulation that complicates an episiotomy wound with friable vaginal mucosa is amenable to surgical excision and postoperative intermittent intermediate doses of topical conjugated equine estrogen vaginal cream.

Indexed as

episiotomyestrogen vaginal creamexuberant granulationproud fleshsurgical excisionwound healing

Identifiers

PMID40166130
PMCPMC11956892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.