Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166082›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2025

Exploring chemical space for "druglike" small molecules in the age of AI.

Aman Achuthan Kattuparambil, Dheeraj Kumar Chaurasia, Shashank Shekhar, Ashwin Srinivasan, Sukanta Mondal, Raviprasad Aduri, B Jayaram

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. AlphaFold for Docking Screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aman Achuthan KattuparambilDepartment of Biological Sciences, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa, India.
Dheeraj Kumar ChaurasiaSchool of Interdisciplinary Research, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Shashank ShekharSupercomputing Facility for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Ashwin SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science & Information Systems, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa, India.
Sukanta MondalDepartment of Biological Sciences, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa, India.
Raviprasad AduriDepartment of Biological Sciences, BITS Pilani K K Birla Goa Campus, Zuarinagar, Goa, India.
B JayaramSupercomputing Facility for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The announcement of 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Alphafold has reiterated the role of AI in biology and mainly in the domain of "drug discovery". Till few years ago, structure-based drug design (SBDD) has been the preferred experimental design in many academic and pharmaceutical R and D divisions for developing novel therapeutics. However, with the advent of AI, the drug design field especially has seen a paradigm shift in its R&D across platforms. If "drug design" is a game, there are two main players, the small molecule drug and its target biomolecule, and the rules governing the game are mainly based on the interactions between these two players. In this brief review, we will be discussing our efforts in improving the state-of-the-art technology with respect to small molecules as well as in understanding the rules of the game. The review is broadly divided into five sections with the first section introducing the field and the challenges faced and the role of AI in this domain. In the second section, we describe some of the existing small molecule libraries developed in our labs and follow-up this section with a more recent knowledge-based resource available for public use. In section four, we describe some of the screening tools developed in our laboratories and are available for public use. Finally, section five delves into how domain knowledge is improving the utilization of AI in drug design. We provide three case studies from our work to illustrate this work. Finally, we conclude with our thoughts on the future scope of AI in drug design.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceBIMPcomputer aided drug design (CADD)machine learning (ML)small molecules

Identifiers

PMID40166082
PMCPMC11955463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.