ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Situational analysis and future directions for medicine retail outlets: compliance with pharmaceutical regulatory standards in Ethiopia.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and determinants of psychotropic drug self-medication among medical students at the university of Gondar, Ethiopia: the role of mental health stigma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of community pharmacy professionals in combating Counterfeit and substandard drugs in the Amhara regional state, Ethiopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Lessons from Ethiopian pharmaceutical regulation: a risk-based approach to overcome challenges and unlock opportunities.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Drivers and strategies to combat substandard and falsified medicines in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review of qualitative evidence.The journal of medicine accessReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Medicine regulation is essential for safeguarding the safety, efficacy, and quality of pharmaceutical products available in medicine retail outlets (MROs). It ensures that medicines, whether sourced locally or internationally, comply with stringent quality standards and regulatory protocols to protect public health. Effective regulation enhances trust in pharmaceutical markets by ensuring the availability of safe and effective medications. However, the regulatory framework within healthcare facilities, particularly in MROs where significant drug-related information is exchanged, is often underperforming. This issue is particularly pronounced in low-and middle-income countries like Ethiopia, where MROs play a critical role as the initial point of healthcare contact. This review aims to assess the level of compliance with pharmaceutical regulatory standards in medicine retail outlets (MROs) in Ethiopia and to evaluate the enforcement of these standards in the country's pharmaceutical market. Methods: The review utilized online databases such as PubMed, and Web of Science to collect relevant studies and reports. It focused on issues of regulatory compliance in MROs in Ethiopia, identifying gaps in practice, drug quality, and adherence to national guidelines set by the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority (EFDA). Results: The review revealed significant regulatory compliance issues within Ethiopian MROs, leading to the distribution of poor quality medicines. It was found that drugs obtained from non-compliant outlets failed to meet quality control standards outlined in drug monographs. Many MROs and pharmacy professionals were found to be non-compliant with EFDA guidelines. Additionally, dispensing and storage practices in MROs were not in line with EFDA regulations and required improvements. Conclusion: The review underlines the need for regulatory enforcement in Ethiopia health settings to address issues of non-compliance and the distribution of poor-quality drugs. It suggests that regulatory bodies should enhance inspection measures and provide opportunities for continued professional development for pharmacy staff and regulatory personnel. Collaboration among regulatory authorities, government, professionals, and academic researchers are pivotal to improving compliance and ensuring the availability of safe, effective, and quality medicines within medicine retail outlets and then protecting public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.