Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40166055›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2025

Risk Factor-Based Screening for Early Detection of Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

Ayana Korsa, Wubshet Tesfaye, Kamal Sud, Ines Krass, Ronald L Castelino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayana KorsaSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wubshet TesfayeSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kamal SudNepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ines KrassSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ronald L CastelinoSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Kidney failure can be prevented or delayed if chronic kidney disease (CKD) is detected and treated early. Targeted screening has been shown effective in detecting CKD worldwide, but a recently updated summary of evidence is lacking. We synthesized up-to-date evidence of the effectiveness of risk factor-based screening for the early detection of CKD among adults in primary care. Study Design: We retrieved articles from Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and Scopus. Relevant gray literature and hand-searching bibliographies of key articles were also performed. Setting & Study Populations: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with at least 1 known CKD risk factor in primary care. Selection Criteria for Studies: Prospective studies applying CKD screening in adults based on at least 1 CKD risk factor. Data Extraction: Data were abstracted from full texts and the risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Analytical Approach: No meta-analysis was conducted. Results: In total, 24 studies from 11 countries fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Diverse screening tests, CKD definitions, formulas for estimating kidney function, and positive screening test cutoffs were used. Most studies (n = 22) employed estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) (n = 14), and dipstick urinalysis (n = 9) for screening. The prevalence of reduced kidney function and/or kidney damage was between 2.9% and 56%, and confirmed CKD varied from 4.4% to 17.1%. Increased patient referrals and physician visits, higher patient satisfaction, and some form of patient willingness to pay for the services were reported because of screening. Limitations: Meta-analysis was not conducted, and the findings might not be generalized to resource-limited settings. Conclusions: Risk factor-based screening effectively identifies a substantial proportion of people with undiagnosed CKD, but there is still scope for improvement. We recommend future studies have robust designs and multidimensional interventions to establish the effectiveness of targeted CKD screening in primary care.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseearly detectionprimary health carescreeningsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40166055
PMCPMC11957498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.