ArticleBrain & spine2025
Physical therapies after surgery for lumbar disc herniation- evidence synthesis from 55 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 4,311 patients.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preoperative paraspinal muscle fatty infiltration and prognosis after lumbar discectomy for disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy of Governor Vessel-Based Acupuncture, Alone or in Combination with Other Therapies, for Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injection with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The role of physical therapy after lumbar disc herniation surgery is unclear. Research question: To determine the impact of physical therapy following LDH surgery (Q1), investigate the effects of activity limitations (Q2), the best time to start physical therapy (Q3), the significance of supervised physical rehabilitation (Q4), the types of physical therapies used (Q5), and the role of additional approaches, such as education, manipulation, and acupuncture, in enhancing the effectiveness of rehabilitation (Q6). Material and methods: This systematic review searched three databases from inception to May 2024. Independent reviewers screened studies, assessed and extracted data, and critically appraised the quality of the available evidence. Results: This systematic review included 55 randomized controlled trials with 4311 patients. We demonstrated that physical therapy after lumbar disc surgery is effective in alleviating pain and improving function and quality of life after surgery for lumbar disc herniation. Exercise regimens aimed at enhancing the endurance, flexibility, and strength of the back musculature are generally efficacious, with the exception of exercises involving neural mobilization. Imposing limitations on physical activity does not yield substantial advantages; however, the occurrence rate of potential complications, the optimal timing for initiating activity and the cost-effectiveness of supervised exercise remain subjects of ongoing discourse. Concurrent application of manual therapy, acupuncture, educational interventions, and behavioral and occupational therapy has the potential to augment outcomes. Discussion and conclusion: Physical therapy improves functional outcomes after lumbar disc surgery. Further studies should address its safety, and cost-effectiveness, and provide dissemination and applicability tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.