Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165928›Full record

ReviewHealth science reports2025

Artificial Intelligence Models Accuracy for Odontogenic Keratocyst Detection From Panoramic View Radiographs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Reyhaneh Shoorgashti, Mohadeseh Alimohammadi, Sana Baghizadeh, Bahareh Radmard, Hooman Ebrahimi, Simin Lesan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. AI-Powered Microscopic Diagnostic Techniques forJournal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reyhaneh ShoorgashtiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-8983
Mohadeseh AlimohammadiFaculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0009-0008-7506-9957
Sana BaghizadehFaculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-7983-4803
Bahareh RadmardSchool of Dentistry Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0009-0003-8803-1425
Hooman EbrahimiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Simin LesanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, School of Dentistry Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3877-328X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is a radiolucent jaw lesion often mistaken for similar conditions like ameloblastomas on panoramic radiographs. Accurate diagnosis is vital for effective management, but manual image interpretation can be inconsistent. While deep learning algorithms in AI have shown promise in improving diagnostic accuracy for OKCs, their performance across studies is still unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI models in detecting OKC from panoramic radiographs. Methods: A systematic search was performed across 5 databases. Studies were included if they examined the PICO question of whether AI models (I) could improve the diagnostic accuracy (O) of OKC in panoramic radiographs (P) compared to reference standards (C). Key performance metrics including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were extracted and pooled using random-effects models. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plots and Egger's test. Results: Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity across all studies was 83.66% (95% CI:73.75%-93.57%) and specificity was 82.89% (95% CI:70.31%-95.47%). YOLO-based models demonstrated superior diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 96.0%, compared to other architectures. Meta-regression analysis indicated that model architecture was a significant predictor of diagnostic performance, accounting for a significant portion of the observed heterogeneity. However, the analysis also revealed publication bias and high variability across studies (Egger's test, Conclusion: AI models, particularly YOLO-based architectures, can improve the diagnostic accuracy of OKCs in panoramic radiographs. While AI shows strong capabilities in simple cases, it should complement, not replace, human expertise, especially in complex situations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningodontogenic cystsodontogenic keratocystsoral diagnosisoral healthpanoramic radiography

Identifiers

PMID40165928
PMCPMC11956212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.