ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Multi-cohort validation based on a novel prognostic signature of anoikis for predicting prognosis and immunotherapy response of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunotherapy is recognized as an effective and promising treatment modality that offers a new approach to cancer treatment. However, identifying responsive patients remains challenging. Anoikis, a distinct form of programmed cell death, plays a crucial role in cancer progression and metastasis. Thus, we aimed to investigate prognostic biomarkers based on anoikis and their role in guiding immunotherapy decisions for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). By consensus clustering, the GSE53624 cohort of ESCC patients was divided into two subgroups based on prognostic anoikis-related genes (ARGs), with significant differences in survival outcomes between the two subgroups. Subsequently, we constructed an ARGs signature with four genes, and its reliability and accuracy were validated both internally and externally. Additional, different risk groups showed notable variances in terms of immunotherapy response, tumor infiltration, functional enrichment, immune function, and tumor mutation burden. Notably, the effectiveness of the signature in predicting immunotherapy response was confirmed across multiple cohorts, including GSE53624, GSE53625, TCGA-ESCC, and IMvigor210, highlighting its potential utility in predicting immunotherapy response. In conclusion, the ARGs signature has the potential to serve as an innovative and dependable prognostic biomarker for ESCC, facilitating personalized treatment strategies in this field, and may represent a valuable new tool for guiding ESCC immunotherapy decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.