Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165870›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Investigating the effects of construction industry noise on workers' cognitive performance and learning efficiency.

Xinying Cao, Yian Lu, Decheng Zheng, Peicheng Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinying CaoSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Yian LuSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Decheng ZhengSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, China.
Peicheng QinSchool of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing industrialization, the cognitive and psychological impacts of construction noise on workers remain inadequately addressed in empirical research. This study examines the impact of different noise types and intensities on the cognitive performance and learning efficiency of construction workers, using electroencephalogram (EEG) and behavioral data. Specifically, it analyzes the effects of complex noise and steady noise on workers' attention, mental workload, mental fatigue, and mental stress. The results indicate that complex noise significantly reduces learning efficiency, notably impairing accuracy and reaction time relative to steady noise. This adverse effect is attributed to the unpredictability and variability of complex noise, which disrupts workers' cognitive processing and heightens mental fatigue. In contrast, although steady noise does not significantly impact mental workload, it induces greater mental fatigue and mental stress than complex noise, especially at high noise levels. The findings also reveal that workers develop some level of adaptation to continuous noise, mitigating its overall impact on learning efficiency. However, elevated noise levels, regardless of type, consistently lead to significant declines in attention and increases in mental stress and mental fatigue. This research makes an original contribution by providing evidence-based insights into the interaction between noise characteristics and worker cognition, offering practical implications for targeted noise management strategies to improve learning efficiency and well-being in construction environments.

Indexed as

cognitive stateconstruction workerselectroencephalogramlearning efficiencynoise

Identifiers

PMID40165870
PMCPMC11955606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.