Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165854›Full record

ReviewStem cells international2025

Effects and Mechanisms of Extracellular Vesicles in Different Models of Acute Kidney Injury.

Weidong Wang, Jingyu Wang, Dan Liao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cells international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weidong WangDepartment of Nephrology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8581-7567
Jingyu WangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100080, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-9587
Dan LiaoDepartment of Nephrology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7892-5060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a rapid decline in renal function caused by ischemia/reperfusion (I/R), renal toxic injury, and sepsis. While the precise molecular mechanisms underlying AKI are still under investigation, current therapeutic approaches remain insufficient. In recent years, there has been growing evidence that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have great potential in accelerating renal repair after AKI in various preclinical models, while there has been extensive research on extracellular vesicles (EVs) as therapeutic mediators in AKI models, and they are considered to be superior to MSCs as new regenerative therapies. EVs are nanoparticles secreted by various types of cells under physiological and pathological conditions. EVs derived from various sources possess biomarker potential and play crucial roles in mediating cellular communication between kidney cells and other tissue cells by transmitting signal molecules. These vesicles play a direct and indirect role in regulating the pathophysiological mechanisms of AKI and contribute to the occurrence, development, treatment, and repair of AKI. In this review, we briefly outline the essential characteristics of EVs, focus on the multiple molecular mechanisms currently involved in the protection of EVs against different types of AKI, and further discuss the potential targets of EVs from different sources in the treatment of AKI. Finally, we summarized the deficiencies in the production and treatment of EVs and the current strategies for improvement.

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryapoptosisextracellular vesiclesinflammation

Identifiers

PMID40165854
PMCPMC11957863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.