Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165851›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

How mathematical models might predict desertification from global warming and dust pollutants.

Eman Hakeem, Shireen Jawad, Ali Hasan Ali, Mohamed Kallel, Husam A Neamah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eman HakeemDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Shireen JawadDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali Hasan AliInstitute of Mathematics, University of Debrecen, Pf. 400, H-4002 Debrecen, Hungary.
Mohamed KallelDepartment of Physics, College of Science, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Husam A NeamahMechatronics Department, Faculty of Engineering, University of Debrecen, Ótemető u. 4-5, Debrecen, 4028, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global warming and dust pollutants endanger humans and the ecosystem. One very efficient way to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and dust is to use plant biomass in a greenbelt. This study provides a mathematical model for how dust pollutants and climate change affect plant biomass dynamics. The proposed model is thoroughly described. The model's analysis is centered on identifying prospective equilibrium positions. The study indicates that it is feasible to establish two steady states. The stability analysis illustrates that both steady states are consistently stable under the specified conditions. The local bifurcations at each steady state are derived; specifically, transcritical bifurcation may occur if a plant's growth rate is selected as a bifurcation point. The theoretical study is validated through numerical simulations. Desertification may arise if the intrinsic growth rate of plant biomass, the dust pollutants-induced plant biomass depletion coefficient, and the coefficient of natural depletion of dust contaminants are not effectively managed, according to the numerical simulation result.•This research describes how to make a nonlinear model and sets its parameters to simulate the risk of desertification caused by global warming and dust pollutants.•The proposed model's behaviour is described using stability analysis theory as a methodology.•Numerical simulations confirm the performance of the proposed methodology.

Indexed as

DesertificationDust pollutantsEquilibrium pointsGlobal warmingMathematical modelPlant biomassStability analysisStability analysis, The 4th-order Runge-Kutta method approximation

Identifiers

PMID40165851
PMCPMC11957603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.