Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165820›Full record

ArticleToxicology research2025

Microsampling in toxicology studies - maximising the scientific, business and 3Rs advantages.

Helen Prior, Adeyemi O Adedeji, Romalie Allen, Derek Angus, Daniel Baker, Hollie Blunt, David Coleman, Helen-Marie Dunmore, Elisa Passini, Tara Putnam and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Helen PriorNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, United Kingdom.
Adeyemi O AdedejiGenentech Inc, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-1990
Romalie AllenLabcorp, Otley Rd, Harrogate, HG3 1PY, United Kingdom.
Derek AngusSyngenta, Jealotts Hill Research Station, Bracknell, RG42 6EY, United Kingdom.
Daniel BakerAstraZeneca,1 Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, United Kingdom.
Hollie BluntSequani Ltd, Bromyard Road, Ledbury, HR8 1LH, United Kingdom.
David ColemanLabcorp, Woolley Road, Alconbury, Huntingdon, PE28 4HS, United Kingdom.
Helen-Marie DunmoreCharles River Laboratories, Elphinstone, Tranent, EH33 2NE, United Kingdom.
Elisa PassiniNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, United Kingdom.
Tara PutnamBoehringer Ingelheim, 900 Ridgebury Rd, Ridgefield, CT, 06877, United States.
Marie-Luce RosseelsUCB BioPharma SRL, Chemin du Foriest 1, Braine-l'Alleud, 1420, Belgium.
Neil SpoonerSpooner Bioanalytical Solutions, 23 Ashbourne Gardens, Hertford, SG13 8BQ, United Kingdom.
Jane StewartApconiX, Alderley Park, Mereside, Macclesfield, SK10 4TG, United Kingdom.
Carol StrepkaCharles River Laboratories, Elphinstone, Tranent, EH33 2NE, United Kingdom.
Alan StokesGSK, 1250 S Collegeville Rd, Collegeville, PA 19426, United States.
Tom VerhaegheJ&J Innovative Medicine, Turnhoutseweg 30, Beerse, 2340, Belgium.
Amanda WilsonLabcorp, Otley Rd, Harrogate, HG3 1PY, United Kingdom.
Fiona SewellNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5589-9453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoption of a blood microsampling technique can reduce or avoid the use of satellite animals (rodents) for toxicokinetics or other purposes in discovery and toxicology studies and provides refinements applicable for both rodents and larger animals. Microsampling can increase the scientific value of data obtained from rodent studies during drug and (agro)chemical development, enabling multiple endpoints to be investigated and compared in an individual animal in the same way as non-rodents. A cross-sector survey was developed to understand the current use of microsampling in toxicology studies, with the aim of identifying the specific studies in which microsampling was employed and the barriers to wider uptake. A high proportion of the survey responses indicated that microsampling was used, however, the extent varied widely. Some organisations use the technique only in non-GLP studies. Microsampling was used most for pharmacokinetics or toxicokinetics, commonly within small molecule and agrochemical toxicity studies, but less frequently within large molecule, cell/gene therapies or industrial chemical studies. A wide variety of barriers to wider use of microsampling were provided, typically around reticence to change from using larger samples, or not wishing to validate another bioanalytical method given the resources and challenges associated with the validation of a new technology. Despite these barriers, some organisations have adopted microsampling routinely across many/all rodent toxicity studies and there are opportunities to further reduce and refine animal use across all sectors by wider adoption of microsampling.

Indexed as

3RsICH S3Amicrosamplingnon-rodentrodent

Identifiers

PMID40165820
PMCPMC11957253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.