Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165802›Full record

ReviewExperimental and therapeutic medicine2025

Tissue adhesion after surgical interventions (Review).

Malin C K Sturm, Alexander Abazid, Matthias B Stope

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Effect of TISSEELMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Malin C K SturmDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.
Alexander AbazidDepartment of General, Visceral and Thorax Surgery, Bundeswehr Hospital Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany.
Matthias B StopeDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, D-53127 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue adhesion after surgical procedures is a common postoperative complication that affects a significant number of patients across all surgical disciplines. In pelvic surgical procedures, second-look surgeries have revealed adhesions in more than half of all patients weeks to several months after surgery. Adhesions can be asymptomatic, but they can also cause a wide range of complications, such as severe pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation, ileus and reproductive dysfunction. Undetected adhesions that lead to problems in subsequent surgical interventions are also of high clinical importance. Lysis of these adhesions before the actual surgery leads to loss of time and possible additional complications, such as trocar injuries in laparoscopies or inadvertent enterotomies during adhesiolysis, during the originally planned intervention. The health care associated with adhesion-related problems are significant. Because of the widely varying manifestations of symptoms, the already concerning figure of patients with significant adhesions is likely to increase. Outpatient healthcare expenditures are further increased because of undetected adhesions. Adhesions therefore represent a major surgical and health economic problem; however, yet there are currently few options for prophylaxis and treatment.

Indexed as

adhesion prophylaxisadhesion therapyperitoneumpostoperative complicationssurgery

Identifiers

PMID40165802
PMCPMC11956145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.