Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165798›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

A novel moving phantom insert for image quality assessment in magnetic resonance imaging.

Frédérique P D van Gameren, Pim T S Borman, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Mike Cole, Grant R Koenig, Martin F Fast, Astrid L H M W van Lier

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frédérique P D van GamerenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Pim T S BormanUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mike ColeIBA Quasar, Modus Medical Devices, London, Ontario, Canada.
Grant R KoenigIBA Quasar, Modus Medical Devices, London, Ontario, Canada.
Martin F FastUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Astrid L H M W van LierUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiotherapy, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dedicated motion compensated Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for radiotherapy treatment planning promises to mitigate motion effects on imaging. We demonstrate a novel insert for an MRI safe motion phantom, which enables quality assurance of these image strategies. The capability to analyse apparent slice thickness, positional accuracy and motion blur is demonstrated for scenarios with and without motion. A respiratory-compensated scan with a 4 mm trigger-window and 16 mm peak-to-peak (p2p) motion showed a +5.0% deviation from the nominal 2 mm slice thickness. In contrast, a non-compensated scan with 4 mm p2p motion showed a +77.5% deviation, illustrating the effectiveness of motion compensation.

Indexed as

Motion compensationMRIMRIgRTPhantom designQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID40165798
PMCPMC11957783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.