ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026
A neuromuscular clinician's primer on machine learning.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Complementary Roles of Neuromuscular Ultrasound and Electrodiagnostic Studies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Predicting Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Mortality With Machine Learning in Diverse Patient Databases.Muscle & nerve · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is the future of clinical practice and is increasingly utilized in medical management and clinical research. The release of ChatGPT3 in 2022 brought generative AI to the headlines and rekindled public interest in software agents that would complete repetitive tasks and save time. Artificial intelligence/machine learning underlies applications and devices which are assisting clinicians in the diagnosis, monitoring, formulation of prognosis, and treatment of patients with a spectrum of neuromuscular diseases. However, these applications have remained in the research sphere, and neurologists as a specialty are running the risk of falling behind other clinical specialties which are quicker to embrace these new technologies. While there are many comprehensive reviews on the use of artificial intelligence/machine learning in medicine, our aim is to provide a simple and practical primer to educate clinicians on the basics of machine learning. This will help clinicians specializing in neuromuscular and electrodiagnostic medicine to understand machine learning applications in nerve and muscle ultrasound, MRI imaging, electrical impendence myography, nerve conductions and electromyography and clinical cohort studies, and the limitations, pitfalls, regulatory and ethical concerns, and future directions. The question is not whether artificial intelligence/machine learning will change clinical practice, but when and how. How future neurologists will look back upon this period of transition will be determined not by how much changed or by how fast clinicians embraced this change but by how much patient outcomes were improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.