Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165723›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Linking micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy and X-ray computed tomography with model simulation explains differences in nutrient gradients around roots of different types and ages.

Eva Lippold, Magdalena Landl, Eric Braatz, Steffen Schlüter, Rüdiger Kilian, Robert Mikutta, Andrea Schnepf, Doris Vetterlein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva Lippold *Department of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse. 4, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0983-1196
Magdalena Landl *Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, 52428, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8567-0454
Eric BraatzDepartment of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse. 4, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.
Steffen SchlüterDepartment of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse. 4, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-9058
Rüdiger KilianMineralogy and Geochemistry, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 3, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.
Robert MikuttaSoil Science and Soil Protection, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 3, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-6528
Andrea SchnepfForschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, Agrosphere (IBG-3), Juelich, 52428, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2203-4466
Doris VetterleinDepartment of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Strasse. 4, Halle/Saale, 06120, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-3262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant roots create chemical gradients within the rhizosphere, but little information exists on the effect of root properties on the distribution of chemical gradients. The research aim was to analyse and model the effects of root type and age, radial root geometry and root hairs on nutrient gradients in the rhizosphere. Using micro-X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (μ-XRF) combined with X-ray computed tomography (X-ray CT), we analysed nutrient gradients around root segments with different diameters and ages of two Zea mays genotypes (wild-type and root hair defective mutant) growing in two substrates (loam and sand). Gradients of key nutrients were compared with gradients obtained by a process-based, radially symmetric 1D rhizosphere model. Results show that root hairs matter for nutrient uptake during supply limitation (phosphorus (P)), but not when it is limited by uptake kinetics (calcium (Ca), sulphur (S)). Higher Ca and S accumulation was observed at the surface of older and thicker root segments than at younger and thinner root segments. Micro-XRF proved suitable for the detection of nutrient gradients of Ca and S, but not of P. While continuum modelling was well suited to explain observed nutrient gradients, it was less effective in representing pore-related phenomena, such as precipitation reactions, which calls for new homogenization approaches.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalNutrientsPlant RootsSpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionTomography, X-Ray ComputedZea maysCalciumPhosphorusRhizosphereSulfurCalciumNutrientsPhosphorusSulfurcorrelative imagingnutrient gradientsrhizosphereroot modellingX‐ray CTZea maysμ‐XRF

Identifiers

PMID40165723
PMCPMC12018778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.