Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165707›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.

Charlotte H Chang, Susan C Cook-Patton, James T Erbaugh, Luci Lu, Yuta J Masuda, István Molnár, Dávid Papp, Brian E Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charlotte H ChangDepartment of Biology and Environmental Analysis Program, Pomona College, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1274-7721
Susan C Cook-PattonThe Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-4397
James T ErbaughDepartment of Environmental Studies, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-9045
Luci LuJornada Experimental Range, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-4032
Yuta J MasudaPaul G. Allen Family Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-4855
István MolnárLexunit Zrt, Budapest, Hungary.
Dávid PappLexunit Zrt, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8814-2745
Brian E RobinsonDepartment of Geography, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8972-8318

Funding

Bezos Earth FundNature Conservancy
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing global environmental conservation problems requires rapidly translating natural and conservation social science evidence to policy-relevant information. Yet, exponential increases in scientific production combined with disciplinary differences in reporting research make interdisciplinary evidence syntheses especially challenging. Ongoing developments in natural language processing (NLP), such as large language models, machine learning (ML), and data mining, hold the promise of accelerating cross-disciplinary evidence syntheses and primary research. The evolution of ML, NLP, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems in computational science research provides new approaches to accelerate all stages of evidence synthesis in conservation social science. To show how ML, language processing, and AI can help automate and scale evidence syntheses in conservation social science, we describe methods that can automate querying the literature, process large and unstructured bodies of textual evidence, and extract parameters of interest from scientific studies. Automation can translate to other research agendas in conservation social science by categorizing and labeling data at scale, yet there are major unanswered questions about how to use hybrid AI-expert systems ethically and effectively in conservation.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesData MiningNatural Language ProcessingSocial SciencesArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learningaprendizaje automáticociencias sociales de la conservaciónconservation social scienceevidence synthesislanguage modelsmachine learningmodelos lingüísticosnatural language processingprocesamiento lingüístico naturalsíntesis de evidencias

Identifiers

PMID40165707
PMCPMC11959320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.