Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165693›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2025

Conservation and the social sciences revisited.

Alia M Dietsch, Matthew J Selinske, Lily M van Eeden, Kwan-Lamar Blount-Hill, Rina S Hauptfeld, Sayan Banerjee, Stephanie Brittain, Francisco Gelves-Gómez, Amit Kaushik, Patricia Manzano Fischer and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Conservation and the social sciences revisited.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alia M DietschSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Matthew J SelinskeSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0191-9364
Lily M van EedenSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-9670
Kwan-Lamar Blount-HillSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Rina S HauptfeldSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Sayan BanerjeeSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2292-0567
Stephanie BrittainSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-0391
Francisco Gelves-GómezSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Amit KaushikSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Patricia Manzano FischerSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
M Kutub UddinSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth E WallenSocial Science Working Group, Society for Conservation Biology, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

community engagementenvironmental social sciencehuman dimensionsinterdisciplinary collaborationorganizational culturesocial sciencevolunteer motivations

Identifiers

PMID40165693
PMCPMC11959342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.