ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025
Adapting an Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Intervention for Remote Delivery to People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Multi-Method Approach.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expectations and Experiences of Peer Mentors in Supporting People With Osteoarthritis and Socioeconomic Disadvantage: A Multi-Method Exploration of Challenges and Lessons Learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) is a common musculoskeletal condition which can cause debilitating pain and other symptoms. OA is more prevalent, and the impact is greater, among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. While peer support is a recommended strategy for addressing these health inequalities, evidence in this area is limited. We previously developed and feasibility tested an in-person OA peer mentorship intervention in a group with limited diversity. This study adapted the intervention for remote delivery to people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage.
methodsThis multi-method study was informed by the ADAPT guidance. Focus groups and interviews were conducted with 20 adults with hip/knee OA experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage to explore barriers and enablers to engagement with remote OA peer mentorship. The findings and project team members' suggestions informed provisional adaptations. The intervention was further adapted and finalised through two participatory workshops conducted with five people with relevant lived experience, four community organisation representatives, and six Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) representatives; and four intervention delivery practice runs undertaken by four PPI representatives.
findingsA wide range of barriers and enablers were identified to two target behaviours - using self-management strategies and attending remote OA peer mentorship sessions. The identified barriers/enablers and additional study activities led to various adaptations. These spanned the delivery and content of the peer mentor training, mentorship sessions, and supporting resources. The adapted intervention consists of six 1-h self-management support sessions delivered remotely by a trained peer mentor. The remote format is flexible, with support available for addressing barriers related to making videoconferencing calls.
conclusionsThis study rigorously and systematically adapted an in-person OA peer mentorship intervention for remote delivery to people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Employing a multi-method approach with diverse partners was key to identifying what adaptations were required. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: PPI representatives played a central role in this study as project team members (two individuals), Project Advisory Group members (three individuals), and wider PPI group members (six additional individuals). This extensive PPI aimed to ensure the adapted OA peer mentorship intervention is useful, acceptable, and accessible to the people it aims to benefit.
trial registrationISRCTN registration of the overall project was obtained on 18 May 2023 (ISRCTN78088278).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.