ArticleBrain and behavior2025
An Italian Survey on the Management of Pediatric Convulsive Status Epilepticus: More Than Just a Pharmacological Choice.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam intravenous infusion combined with midazolam continuous pump infusion for stepwise emergency treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in children: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeTo explore specialists' opinions on the current management of pediatric convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) in Italy and the main factors influencing the applicability of guidelines.
methodsWe conducted a national survey of child neurologists, pediatric emergency physicians, and intensivists. Within the multidisciplinary Italian Paediatric Status Epilepticus (IPSE) Group, a web-based 48-multiple-choice questionnaire was developed to explore treatment choices, use of internal protocols and guidelines, and self-perceived competencies in the treatment of CSE.
resultsResponses were received from 250 clinicians from 34 Italian hospitals (response rate 71%). Intravenous midazolam (iv-MDZ) was the preferred benzodiazepine (BDZ) when iv access was available (90%). When iv-access was unavailable, 75% of clinicians used BDZs; rectal diazepam was the most indicated (65.6%). Concerning second-line treatment, the choices were equally distributed between phenytoin (55.2%), levetiracetam (52.4%), and phenobarbital (52.4%). MDZ infusion at a dosage < 0.23 mg/kg/h was also a frequent choice (38%). A PICU in the hospital influenced this latter choice, resulting in a significantly greater use of iv-MDZ by pediatric emergency physicians working in these hospitals. Answers' variability was related to organizational aspects such as the availability of on-duty specialists and diagnostic tools in emergency settings.
conclusionsThis survey confirmed that first-line treatment of pediatric CSE relied on iv-MDZ and that the heterogeneity of therapeutic choices started from the second-line treatment in real life. The survey also highlighted the need to consider the organizational heterogeneity among settings and to involve different specialties in an integrated and feasible approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.