Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40165450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2025

Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review.

Kathleen Parry, Christopher Picard, Rashmi Devkota, Kaitlyn Tate

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kathleen ParryAlberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Christopher PicardNursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Rashmi DevkotaNursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kaitlyn TateNursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-7515

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEmergency department (ED) patient navigators are increasingly used, but a lack of understanding of how ED navigator interventions are designed, described, and evaluated creates gaps in our ability to understand, monitor and improve care. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify how the literature describes and evaluates ED patient navigator interventions for older people transitioning to a primary care setting.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Johanna Briggs Institute updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. We searched three databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. We included English language articles without any restrictions on study designs that two reviewers screened. All articles focused on distinct ED navigator roles to facilitate transitions for older people from the ED to primary care were included. Data extraction was completed by the primary reviewer and validated by two secondary reviewers. We report study characteristics in a table. Descriptive content analysis was used to analyse the main findings.

resultsA total of 10 studies were included out of 2102 articles identified. All studies used quantitative designs except one, which used a qualitative research design. Four studies were conducted in the United States, two in Australia and the UK and one in Canada and Belgium. Twenty unique outcome measures were identified, with hospital admission rate, frequency of ED presentations and ED/hospital length of stay being the most common. We identified six intervention components: assessment, consultation, liaison, development of care plan, referral and follow-up. Interventions using 4 or more components more commonly reported positive outcomes. Outcome measures used to evaluate interventions were often not tracked across care settings, potentially obscuring the impact of ED navigator interventions across the care continuum.

conclusionFuture research should examine which patients benefit from ED navigation and which outcome measures might help contextualise intervention effectiveness across care settings.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient NavigationAgedHumansemergency departmentinterventionsolder peopleprimary carescoping reviewtransition

Identifiers

PMID40165450
PMCPMC11959214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.