ArticleJournal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM2025
The diagnostic utility of bioelectrical impedance analysis in distinguishing precocious puberty from premature thelarche.
Article in Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesClinical (assessing breast development), laboratory (FSH, LH, estradiol, and GnRH stimulation test), and radiological methods (bone age and pelvic ultrasonography) are used to distinguish central precocious puberty (CPP) from premature thelarche (PT). We examined also via bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).
methodsThe fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM), muscle mass (MM), bone mass (BM), total body water, and percentages (%), basal metabolic rate, phase angle (PhA), muscle-to-fat ratio (MFR), sarcopenic index, and segmental body proportions were determined via Tanita MC-780 MA model measuring device.
resultsA total of 111 girls, 34 with CPP, 35 with PT, and 42 with healthy controls, were included. Although the baseline weight, height, and BMI SDS of the groups were not statistically different, the FM (%) was found to be lower (p=0.021), and the FFM (%) (p=0.021), MM (%) (p=0.015), BM (%) (p=0.022), and MFR values (p=0.017) were higher in CPP group. In CPP group, right arm FM (%) (p=0.016), left arm FM (%) (p=0.007), and trunk FM (%) (p=0.008) were lower than other groups.
conclusionsWe detected a MFR cutoff value of (2.96) with 58.8 % sensitivity and 58.4 % specificity, a cutoff value of (3.57) with 50 % sensitivity and 82 % specificity to differentiate CPP cases from others (PT and healthy controls). These rates are relatively low, but these are the first results in this field and may be guiding for studies conducted in large series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40165449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.