ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2025
Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and prevention measures among female students in Poland: a cross-sectional, decade apart study.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preliminary Validation of the Greek Version of the Cervical Cancer Prevention Knowledge (CCKP) Questionnaire.Cureus · 2026Article
- Thyroid disorders as predictors of cemiplimab efficacy in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer: real-world evidence from Poland.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCervical cancer (CC) is a global health issue, despite the availability of effective preventive measures. The objective of this investigation was to evaluate the comprehension of CC and its preventive measures among 17-25-year-old female students living in southern Poland, to compare the results with the data obtained in 2012 and to propose actionable recommendations for improving the current state of affairs.
methodsThe study collected data from 464 female students during a ten-month period in 2022 using a pre-validated tool developed by our group, CCKP-64 categorized into sections: personal information, basic CC knowledge, risk factor assessment, awareness of primary and secondary prevention, and sources of information.
resultsThe 98.92% of participants were aware of CC, 42.24% linked it to an infection. Genetic factors and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were commonly identified as risk factors. Most of the participants (81.90%) knew about the Pap smear and planned to undergo the test (74.74%). The most common sources of information were the Internet (81.68%), family and friends (46.77%), and medical staff (42.89%). Comparison with the 2012 cohort indicated a decrease in awareness of HPV vaccine existence (69.85% vs. 53.23%, p<0.001) and cytological examination (91.21% vs. 81.90%, p<0.001), but increase in percentage of vaccinated population (9.35% vs. 19.43%, p=0.001).
conclusionThe insufficient knowledge and deteriorating trends in CC prevention among young women over the last decade are concerning. The proportion of vaccinated women remains unsatisfactory. Measures to enhance awareness of national reimbursed HPV vaccination program are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.