ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Accuracy of distance distributions and dynamics from single-molecule FRET.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cooperativity, dynamics, and the free-energy surfaces of charge-patterned IDPs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-molecule spectroscopy combined with Förster resonance energy transfer is widely used to quantify distance dynamics and distributions in biomolecules. Most commonly, measurements are interpreted using simple analytical relations between experimental observables and the underlying distance distributions. However, these relations make simplifying assumptions, such as a separation of timescales between interdye distance dynamics, fluorescence lifetimes, and dye reorientation, the validity of which is notoriously difficult to assess from experimental data alone. Here, we use experimentally validated long-timescale, all-atom explicit-solvent molecular dynamics simulations of a disordered peptide with explicit fluorophores for testing these assumptions, in particular the separation of the relevant timescales and the description of chain dynamics in terms of diffusion in a potential of mean force. Our results allow us to quantitatively assess the resulting errors; they indicate that, even outside the simple limiting regimes, the errors from common approximations in data analysis are generally smaller than the systematic uncertainty limiting the accuracy of Förster resonance energy transfer efficiencies. We also illustrate how the direct comparison between measured and simulated experimental data can be employed to optimize force field parameters and develop increasingly realistic simulation models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.